In the article Are We There Yet? (2009) By R. Vivian Acosta and Linda Jean Carpenter great points were made about Title IX. The article depicted the college sports scene for women’s athletics at a typical University, what Title IX gave to women’s athletics, and where we are today and the progress that still needs to be made.
The article did a great job portraying the lack of support, funding, and realization of women’s athletics pre 1972. How funding was self-supported, teams were coached by full time teachers or staff members, that seasons were short, and how athletic departments were split by having a separate Athletic Director who managed the women’s programs.
Title IX brought drastic change for the world of college athletics. It helped put more of an emphasis on women’s sports and giving women an equal opportunity to compete as men. It also merged men’s and women’s athletics in an organizational standpoint, putting the Men’s Athletic Director in charge of both men’s and women’s sports. It helped with equal funding of women’s sports, covering things such as travel expense and coaches stipends.
Yet a lot of good has been made through Title IX in regards to women’s athletics there is still progress to be made as stated within the article. I was drawn to a few of the key issues that remained:
· Coaching compensation relates to the job being done, not to the sex of the athletes being coached, the sex of the coach, or the sport being coached.
· Women coaches of men’s teams are accepted and supported for their coaching skills, without regard to their sex.
The first issue is an interesting point but sadly is one I do not see change in the foreseeable future. There will always be a dividing line in the amount a coach makes coaching women’s sports than men’s. I think the main focus should be on fairness amongst women’s coaches not biased upon sex rather based on skill, experience, and success. For example take BGSU’s very own Women’s Basketball Coach Curt Miller. His success is outstanding within our program but he won’t make as much as say the head football coach even though he has had far more success. I think if anything a program should compare salaries based on level of importance to the institution. As an example BGSU’s foremost men’s sport is football, and women’s sport is basketball. So in retrospect salaries should be made comparable to the relevance and appeal within a program.
I find it hard to imagine a woman ever coaching a men’s team in Division I athletics. Mainly due to the fact that there is such a high level of respect demanded in working with male college athletes. If the coach is a woman there will always be that underlying lack of a basic respect, especially in the game of football.
I think it is great what Title IX has done for women’s progression in college athletics and I do believe that women’s athletics will continue to advance in a natural evolution. With more and more coverage of women’s athletics on television following of various sports and teams will increase and will result in a continual advancement of women’s athletics.
~Tony Fritsch